Loading…
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from 97-19-b.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • CLERK OF COURT - AUTHORITY OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO ZERO OUT AN ARREARAGE RESULTING FROM A TEMPORARY ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT WHEN THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION IS SILENT AS TO THAT ARREARAGE ______________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, there are instances in a dissolution of marriage action where prior to the conclusion of the action an order for temporary child support has been entered and an arrearage has accrued but the final judgment does not address this arrearage. • That the Clerk of the Court for Brevard County shall be authorized to zero out the arrearage that exists in their records as a result of a temporary child support order when a final judgment of dissolution of marriage is entered which does not address or include any provisions regarding the temporary support arrearage.
CLERK OF COURT - AUTHORITY OF THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO ZERO OUT AN ARREARAGE RESULTING FROM A TEMPORARY ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT WHEN THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION IS SILENT AS TO THAT ARREARAGE ______________________________________________________________________ WHEREAS, there are instances in a dissolution of marriage action where prior to the conclusion of the action an order for temporary child support has been entered and an arrearage has accrued but the final judgment does not address this arrearage.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 47fefb26e94850480e13189d9c026e06937f08e0813c55df663e04be09bd439e (68979 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.