Loading…
2 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., Opinions — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.
Fifth Judicial Circuit (Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion, Sumter). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from https://www.circuit5.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/oregon-llc-vs-city-of-leesburg-updated.pdf, harvested 2026-07-25; whitespace normalised only. • A repeat violation is defined as a violation of a code “by a person who has been previously found…to have violated…the same provision within 5 years prior to the violation, notwithstanding the violations occur at different locations.” §162.04(5), Fla. • To pierce the veil of protection for an LLC, it must be shown that members (1) “dominated and controlled the LLC to such an extent that the LLC had no existence independent of” the members and it was merely an instrumentality or alter-ego of them;
A repeat violation is defined as a violation of a code “by a person who has been previously found…to have violated…the same provision within 5 years prior to the violation, notwithstanding the violations occur at different locations.” §162.04(5), Fla.
Reviewer note: PDF sha256: 25fe7f9341575a061cfb867fefeb8d27af3d5e78969fd99b8e4ee85ecfcc0e07. Extracted from the document's own text layer.
Judge Bell caps motions and responses at 5 pages for UMC hearings and 12 pages for special-set hearings.
Judge Alijewicz requires every motion for attorney's fees and/or costs to attach a document detailing time records — no records, no fee award.
Judge Corlew bars informal contact: every communication with the Court must be in writing, filed with the Clerk, with copies furnished to all parties — and no calls to the JA to schedule or cancel UMC.