Loading…
Official rule; awaiting reverification against the current source text. Verify with the clerk, judicial assistant, or official court website before relying on it.
The Fifth Circuit's original AI order (signed April 2, 2026) required every filing containing AI-generated content to disclose AI use on the face of the document, include a scripted certification block, and identify the specific AI tool used — with sanctions up to Bar referral. Superseded June 15, 2026 by A-2026-13-A, which eliminated all three requirements after AOSC26-12 preemption.
HISTORICAL — SUPERSEDED. Original requirements (Apr. 2 – Jun. 15, 2026): (1) §2: when AI was used in preparation, research, drafting, filing or discovery, "the document shall identify the specific tool used in such manner"; (2) §6 Certification: "All filings or submissions containing AI-generated content must disclose the use of AI on the face of the document, pleading, and/or filing" and include verbatim: "The undersigned hereby certifies that artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of [TITLE OF DOCUMENT BEING FILED]. The undersigned has independently verified the accuracy of every citation to the law and/or the record, and the accuracy of any language drafted by generative artificial intelligence, including quotations, citations, paraphrased assertions, facts, and legal analysis."; (3) §7 prohibited "undisclosed substantive AI drafting" and "unverified AI legal analysis"; (4) §9 sanctions: contempt, striking of pleadings, dismissal, fines, attorney fees, Florida Bar referral. SUPERSESSION: A-2026-13-A §10 states "This Administrative Order supersedes Administrative Order A-2026-13 and shall take effect June 15, 2026 at 12:01 a.m." — the amended title dropped the words "Disclosure of AI Use, The Certification of AI Generated Information." The old landing page 301-redirects to the amended order; the original PDF remains at the 2026/04 uploads path.
The undersigned hereby certifies that artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of [TITLE OF DOCUMENT BEING FILED]. The undersigned has independently verified the accuracy of every citation to the law and/or the record...
Reviewer note: Full original recovered by BenchPath 2026-07-20 (sha256 cfeb771f…) — prior research pass could not locate the text or exact URL. Wayback 2026-04-15 snapshot corroborates original title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. PUBLISHED 2026-09-02 (July-hold adjudication by full text): the superseded Fifth Circuit AI mandate, preserved as the historical chain entry the tracker renders; supersession stated verbatim.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.