Loading…
Official rule; awaiting reverification against the current source text. Verify with the clerk, judicial assistant, or official court website before relying on it.
11th Circuit AO 1-26-04 — Generative AI Disclosure & Verification [RESCINDED chain: 26-15 → 1-26-18]
[RESCISSION CHAIN: AO 1-26-04 (entered 2026-01-15) was RESCINDED and replaced by AO 26-15 (2026-05-19, per the circuit's official May 20 press release; 26-15 PDF unfetchable in both research passes — text UNVERIFIED). AO 26-15 was itself RESCINDED by AO 1-26-18, signed June 11, 2026, EFFECTIVE June 15, 2026 at 12:01 a.m. — the exact AOSC26-12 moment. The active AO registry serves neither 26-04 nor 26-15 (rescinded orders purged). County Civil and Probate division pages still LINKED AO 26-04 as current as of 2026-07-19 (stale-link anomaly, tasked). No AI disclosure/certification mandate remains in force circuit-wide; Rule 2.515(d)(2) controls.] HISTORICAL VERBATIM (AO 26-04, full text recovered and archived in-repo, chatgpt-corpus/ADMINISTRATIVE_ORDERS/source_text/AO_26-04.txt): "2. MANDATORY DISCLOSURE OF AI USE: Any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any generative artificial intelligence tool in the preparation of a pleading, motion, memorandum, response, proposed order, or other court record, must disclose such use on the face of the filing. 3. REQUIRED CERTIFICATION: The filing shall include a statement substantially in the following form: \"Generative artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of this filing. The undersigned certifies that all factual assertions, legal authority, and citations have been independently reviewed and verified for accuracy and accepts full responsibility for the contents of this filing.\" This certification may be included at the conclusion of the filing or immediately above the signature block. 5. PROHIBITED CONDUCT: … submission of fictitious, fabricated, or hallucinated legal authority, statutes, quotations, or facts; reliance on AI-generated citations without independent verification; misrepresentation of AI-generated content as independently researched authority; or failure to disclose the use of AI as required by this Order. 6. SANCTIONS: Failure to comply … may result in sanctions, including but not limited to striking the filing; denial of the requested relief; monetary sanctions; contempt proceedings; referral to The Florida Bar … DONE AND ORDERED … this 15th day of January 2026. ARIANA FAJARDO ORSHAN, CHIEF JUDGE." Recitals cite Takefman v. Pickleball Club, LLC, 418 So. 3d 826, 827 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) and SC2024-0032.
Reviewer note: Chain resolves the pre-relaunch "AO 26-04 [TEXT PENDING]" watch. Full verbatim recovered 2026-07-20 and archived in-repo (commit 496c1ca); operative sections quoted above. 26-15 text remains UNVERIFIED (both passes). | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. PUBLISHED 2026-09-02 (July-hold adjudication by full text): the Eleventh Circuit AI rescission chain with the recovered verbatim text — the tracker's historical entry.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.