Fourteenth Circuit — AI disclosure/certification mandate (AO 2025-00-09) RESCINDED effective June 15, 2026 by AO 2026-00-02 · BenchPath

Fourteenth Circuit — AI disclosure/certification mandate (AO 2025-00-09) RESCINDED effective June 15, 2026 by AO 2026-00-02

Medium — verify before relying· verified July 24, 2026Administrative OrdersFla. 14th Jud. Cir. Admin. Orders 2025-00-09 and 2026-00-02; AOSC26-12; SC2026-0673

Official rule; awaiting reverification against the current source text. Verify with the clerk, judicial assistant, or official court website before relying on it.

Summary

The Fourteenth Circuit's AO 2025-00-09 required face-of-document disclosure of generative AI use plus a scripted certification, on pain of document exclusion. AO 2026-00-02, signed June 4, 2026, rescinds it effective June 15, 2026 — the instant AOSC26-12 and amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) took effect. No AI disclosure or certification mandate survives in this circuit; amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) governs statewide.

Applies to

Historical: adopted September 16, 2025 (signed by Chief Judge Patterson, recorded Bay County OR BK 4953 PG 635); rescinded before the statewide preemption deadline. Both PDFs are image-only and were read visually from BenchPath-hashed bytes.

Requirement

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that AO 2025-00-09 Responsible Use of AI Generated Technologies is hereby rescinded effective June 15, 2026. [From the rescinded order:] any attorney or pro se litigant who submits to the court any filing or submission containing AI-generated content, must disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence on the face of the document and also must include a certification that the attorney or pro se litigant has personally reviewed and verified the content's accuracy.

Source of truth

AO 2025-00-09 Responsible Use of AI Generated Technologies is hereby rescinded effective June 15, 2026

Official source: 14th Circuit — Administrative Orders (full ledger)
Source health: Healthy · checked September 6, 2026
Effective date: June 15, 2026
Last verified: July 24, 2026benchpath-arbitration-2026-07-24

Reviewer note: | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. PUBLISHED 2026-09-02 (July-hold adjudication by full text): the Fourteenth Circuit AI mandate and its rescission, verbatim — the tracker's historical entry.

Change history

July 29, 2026Monitor: content changed at 14th Circuit — Administrative Orders (full ledger). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 28, 2026Monitor: 14th Circuit — Administrative Orders (full ledger) unreachable (timeout or network error).

4th Cir. — AO 1986-33A Amended Administrative Order No. 86-33 Compensation for Court Appointed Attorneys in Crimi

2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.

High confidence· verified August 3, 2026Fourth Judicial Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A, filed 05/12/1988, published on the Duval Clerk's administrative-orders store — sha256-hashed 2026-08-03

Administrative OrdersFourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. — AO 1987-09 Administrative Order 87-09 Court Reporters - Requests for Transcripts

1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.

High confidence