Chief Judge Charles A. Schwab's Administrative Order 2026-06 (In re: Rescission of Administrative Order 2025-10) rescinded the circuit's AI disclosure-and-certification mandate effective June 15, 2026 at 12:01 a.m. — the same instant AOSC26-12's statewide preemption took effect — citing the Supreme Court's amendment of Rule 2.515 (SC2026-0673). The Nineteenth is one of eight circuits verified to have formally rescinded an AI administrative order.
Circuit-wide (Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, St. Lucie). After this date no AI-specific disclosure or certification requirement exists in the Nineteenth Circuit; Rule 2.515(d)(2) alone governs.
• All parties and counsel shall review and comply with Florida Rule of General Practice and Procedure 2.515, as amended and effective June 15, 2026, and as may be amended thereafter. • Consistent with that Rule, signers are reminded that they bear full responsibility for verifying the existence and accuracy of every legal authority cited in a filing, and that violations may result in sanctions as set forth therein.
All parties and counsel shall review and comply with Florida Rule of General Practice and Procedure 2.515, as amended and effective June 15, 2026, and as may be amended thereafter.
Reviewer note: | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 1 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote. Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.