Loading…
2 verbatim requirements from this First Circuit document.
First Judicial Circuit (Escambia, Santa Rosa, Okaloosa, Walton). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the operative section, harvested 2026-08-02; whitespace normalised only. • EFFECTIVE DATE: The Shared Parenting Schedule and Shared Parental Responsibility Statement, as revised, shall be prospective and effective January 30, 2007, for all matters which have adopted a shared parenting schedule, including any prior Shared Parenting Schedule (visitation schedule) pertaining to children affected by domestic litigation. Although the application of this schedule is not retroactive, parents may agree to its application in their case and submit a stipulated order for the court’s approval. If the secondary parent would like for this schedule to apply and the primary parent opposes its application, the secondary parent may file a petition requesting the court to adopt this schedule in their case. The parties may be required to mediate prior to the scheduling of a court hearing. A rebuttal presumption is hereby created that presumes this schedule is in the best interest of the minor child(ren). • SHARED PARENTING SCHEDULE: The attached Shared Parenting Schedule approved by the judges assigned to the Family Law Division, supersedes all other Shared Parenting Schedules (standard visitation schedules) which have previously been used in family cases in Santa Rosa County and any updates or revisions thereto, and shall be known as the “Shared Parenting Schedule.”
EFFECTIVE DATE: The Shared Parenting Schedule and Shared Parental Responsibility Statement, as revised, shall be prospective and effective January 30, 2007, for all matters which have adopted a shared parenting schedule, including any prior Shared Parenting Schedule (visitation schedule) pertaining to children affected by domestic litigation. Although the application of this schedule is not retroactive, parents may agree to its application in their case and submit a stipulated order for the court’s approval. If the secondary parent would like for this schedule to apply and the primary parent opposes its application, the secondary parent may file a petition requesting the court to adopt this schedule in their case. The parties may be required to mediate prior to the scheduling of a court hearing. A rebuttal presumption is hereby created that presumes this schedule is in the best interest
Reviewer note: PDF sha256: 4565c33b314c3ed7f571143a0189f06b9b26990190ec2ef82cfe284a7e3836f8. Read from the ORDERED section as numbered paragraphs.
18 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., M-2018-65 — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.
13 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., Interpreter Services – English — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.
25 verbatim mandatory provisions from AO 2022-004.