Loading…
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from AO 2008-44 Authority of State Attorney to Hold Arrest Warrants.
First Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE OF STATE ATTORNEY, FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT – AUTHORITY OF STATE ATTORNEY TO HOLD ARREST WARRANTS WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the judiciary to review affidavits of probable cause presented for the issuance of warrants of arrest; and WHEREAS, it is the Office of the State Attorney which is charged with the responsibility of ultimately determining whether to prosecute a criminal case; and WHEREAS, there are often occasions where the Office of the State Attorney is presented additional information after the issuance by a Judge of an arrest warrant, but prior to the execution of the warrant, that dictates in the interest of justice that a criminal prosecution not be maintained, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Office of the State Attorney for the First Judicial Circuit is authorized to place a hold on certain issued arrest warrants in order to adequately investigate the allegations and upon determining that a criminal prosecution should not be pursued, the Office of the State Attorney may by written memorandum request the judge to recall the warrant. • The written memorandum shall be attached to the unexecuted warrant to be maintained by the applicable law enforcement agency pursuant to that agency’s records retention requirements.
STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE OF STATE ATTORNEY, FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT – AUTHORITY OF STATE ATTORNEY TO HOLD ARREST WARRANTS WHEREAS, it is the responsibility of the judiciary to review affidavits of probable cause presented for the issuance of warrants of arrest; and WHEREAS, it is the Office of the State Attorney which is charged with the responsibility of ultimately determining whether to prosecute a criminal case; and WHEREAS, there are often occasions where the Office of the State Attorney is presented additional information after the issuance by a Judge of an arrest warrant, but prior to the execution of the warrant, that dictates in the interest of justice that a criminal prosecution not be maintained, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Office of the State Attorney for the First Judicial Circuit is authorized to place a hold on certain issued arrest warrants in order to adequatel
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 478bb9b8b41dadfe92b4d9aaae0ec3daf63a2f355bbd7d648c592a2081dad40b (43124 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.