Loading…
3 verbatim mandatory provisions from Checklist Guardianship (MH) 2.
First Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • An Attorney shall certify in writing that she/he has reviewed both the checklist and supporting documents prior to submission. • If the submission is deficient, you shall receive a single email identifying the deficiency for correction. • The Attorney acknowledges that the Petition will not be reviewed by the Court until the necessary information has been accepted via the OKALOOSA, PROBATE-GUARDIANSHIP ONLY section of the Florida E-Filing Portal.
An Attorney shall certify in writing that she/he has reviewed both the checklist and supporting documents prior to submission.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 7fb6d56bdaeac2018d3ab183448d90e6e8497246127c3700581d6b77db2fb26a (24786 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.