Loading…
5 verbatim mandatory provisions from SRCAD 2010-04B Procedure Upon Failure To Submit Filing Fees In Appeals To the Circuit Court.
First Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • If the appellate filing fee or an Order of Insolvency is not submitted, or the appellant has not entered into a partial payment agreement with the clerk, within 30 days of the date of the Clerk’s Acknowledgment of the filing of the appeal, the Clerk is instructed to issue a Notice of Non-Compliance with regard to said failure. 2. • Thereupon, the Circuit Court, Appellate Division, shall issue an appropriate order requiring payment of the filing fee or the filing of an Order of Insolvency within 30 days. • If the appellant does not comply, the Court shall issue an Order to Show Cause within 10 days why the appeal should not be dismissed. 3. • If a response is not filed, the filing fee is not paid, or an Order of Insolvency is not submitted within the time provided in the Order to Show Cause, the Court shall issue an Order Dismissing the Appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410. • These procedure apply to cases filed in the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court in which a filing fee is required.
If the appellate filing fee or an Order of Insolvency is not submitted, or the appellant has not entered into a partial payment agreement with the clerk, within 30 days of the date of the Clerk’s Acknowledgment of the filing of the appeal, the Clerk is instructed to issue a Notice of Non-Compliance with regard to said failure. 2.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: b806b16ea078b4da3832fffbc817ad13816bffcd0b895f8d95190bf239ff8de5 (49242 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.