Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from 05-45-b.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • L.R.P. 12.407 prohibits the attendance of a minor child at any court hearing, including Domestic Violence Injunction Proceedings, without prior Court approval; and WHEREAS, that due to mandated time constraints and congested court dockets, there may not be enough time and notice to have a motion for the minor child to testify heard prior to the Final Injunction hearing; and WHEREAS, the moving party may not be able to prove that violence occurred on behalf of the minor child without the attendance and testimony of the minor child; and WHEREAS, the adoption of the following provision will provide for the proper administration of hearing Domestic Violence cases on behalf of a minor child within the Eighteenth Circuit, it is ORDERED: 1.
L.R.P. 12.407 prohibits the attendance of a minor child at any court hearing, including Domestic Violence Injunction Proceedings, without prior Court approval; and WHEREAS, that due to mandated time constraints and congested court dockets, there may not be enough time and notice to have a motion for the minor child to testify heard prior to the Final Injunction hearing; and WHEREAS, the moving party may not be able to prove that violence occurred on behalf of the minor child without the attendance and testimony of the minor child; and WHEREAS, the adoption of the following provision will provide for the proper administration of hearing Domestic Violence cases on behalf of a minor child within the Eighteenth Circuit, it is ORDERED: 1.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 27443fca53ad180535a5efdcc459bb8d79d2a8c7f9169e889e04b6ebed2e5dc1 (88676 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
46 verbatim courtroom requirements published by Judge Michael Rudisill.
16 verbatim courtroom requirements from Judge Jessica G. Costello's published division procedures.