Loading…
5 verbatim mandatory provisions from 07-12-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• No offender may qualify for Work Release if the sentencing judge so indicates on the sentencing order or upon the presentencing consideration request. • Arson B. Prior Record: The offender must not have been convicted of a felony involving violence, the use of a weapon, or the abuse of children within the past seven years prior to the date of the offense for which the offender has been sentenced. C. Health Criteria: • Offenders who are acutely psychotic, severely mentally retarded, current suicidal or otherwise unable to cope with the structured programs in Work Release, or unable to understand and comply with the program conditions, will not be eligible for Work Release. D. Other Criteria: No offender with a "hold" from any other jurisdiction is eligible for Work Release. Offenders serving a sentence or that are presentenced on other charges that do not meet the requirements of this order are not eligible for Work Release. E. Exceptional Cases: The judge having jurisdiction over the case may allow offenders who do not meet the strict criteria of this order into the Work Release Program upon request of the Sheriff or an authorized representative of the Work Release Program. • Revocations: Offenders who fail to comply with the conditions of the 3 Work Release Program are subject to being returned to the jail for service of the balance of the sentence originally imposed. The court will issue a capias to return the defendant to jail if the offender cannot be located.
No offender may qualify for Work Release if the sentencing judge so indicates on the sentencing order or upon the presentencing consideration request.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: b2a58e758eb4ba2d3c05672700750c0859a19e4c7e413e81d39b62c14ae44e47 (92964 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.