4 verbatim mandatory provisions from 09-07-b-amd.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • CRIMINAL - PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM - EXPANSION OF THE RELEASE AUTHORITY OF THE PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM ______________________________________________________________________ Whereas, it is necessary that the undersigned Chief Judge establish, in writing, criteria which the Pretrial Release Program staff must utilize in releasing defendants under their own signature. • However, in cases where the Sheriff of Brevard County, local Chiefs of Police, the State Attorney of the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit, or any of their deputies, assistants, or designees, objects to a detainee’s release by notifying the Pretrial Release Program of said objection; the detainee shall not be released prior to First Appearance. • Release decisions for all such detainees shall be made by the Judge presiding at First Appearance. • All those not meeting the above requirements of release shall be evaluated for Pretrial Release consideration by the Judge presiding at First Appearance.
CRIMINAL - PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM - EXPANSION OF THE RELEASE AUTHORITY OF THE PRETRIAL RELEASE PROGRAM ______________________________________________________________________ Whereas, it is necessary that the undersigned Chief Judge establish, in writing, criteria which the Pretrial Release Program staff must utilize in releasing defendants under their own signature.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 29f81ee6996054f75b307d78986dac2518df4fccffa071cdbe4828d5dff8c51e (118803 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.