Loading…
3 verbatim mandatory provisions from 09-19-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • DOMESTIC RELATIONS - FAMILY DIVISION - SUPPLEMENTAL PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION Supplemental Petitions for Modification in Family Division cases must be filed with the clerk along with the appropriate filing fee, if applicable, and served on the opposing party. • Such petition shall carry the same case number as the final judgment or order for which modification is sought, and shall remain assigned to the same division where that final judgment or order was obtained. • A party wishing to modify an existing Title IVD Child Support order to address parenting plan issues regarding the children must file a Supplemental Petition for Modification in the Title IVD case and serve the other parent or party.
DOMESTIC RELATIONS - FAMILY DIVISION - SUPPLEMENTAL PETITIONS FOR MODIFICATION Supplemental Petitions for Modification in Family Division cases must be filed with the clerk along with the appropriate filing fee, if applicable, and served on the opposing party.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 1061f123e41e7bf0b6d63cde5c2e67a6a2270d3ccf2b56de4a88770db60d08e7 (83899 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.