3 verbatim mandatory provisions from 13-19-b-amd.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• All notifications from electronic monitoring companies of possible violations by person(s) under electronic/GPS monitoring (“alleged violators”) shall be immediately and directly sent only by the electronic monitoring companies to the law enforcement entity having jurisdiction over the alleged violator. • Law Enforcement shall coordinate with the State Attorney’s Office to determine what further action will be taken. 2. • E-mail or letter notifications that are sent in error to the judge’s office by electronic monitoring companies will not be read by the judge or the judicial assistant.
All notifications from electronic monitoring companies of possible violations by person(s) under electronic/GPS monitoring (“alleged violators”) shall be immediately and directly sent only by the electronic monitoring companies to the law enforcement entity having jurisdiction over the alleged violator.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 529180460ff878e9833bb88b26df6ba5d4ec9e3a25fd8f572b28706e4d931588 (96942 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls. Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. [moved from the text 2026-09-14] [Re-filed 2026-09-26: the harvest lane's topic map matched 'mediat' inside 'immediately', so this order was filed under Mediation; with the pattern anchored to whole words the lane's own map files it under Administrative Orders. Text unchanged.] [Corrected 2026-09-26: 1 bulleted sentence had been cut at a semicolon -- a list stem or item published without the rest of its sentence. 1 was removed because the rest of the sentence could not be published whole from the rule's own source (a list item or recital, a page chunk, or a source that is no longer reachable).]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.