Loading…
5 verbatim mandatory provisions from 15-10-b.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • A parent who is a party to a pending Domestic Relations action shall include the other parent’s name on the school contact list when registering or enrolling a child in school in Brevard County, unless that parent has a specific court order relieving the parent of this obligation. • The parent shall include the other parent’s name and contact information, along with any other necessary information required by the school. • When registering or enrolling the child in school, the parent or parents shall designate the true residence of the child. 3. • Parents shall not attempt to register or enroll a child in two different schools. • It shall also be a standing order governing the parties in a pending domestic relations case unless or until the Court has specifically addressed an issue within the scope of this administrative order and has entered an order that is specific to the parties in that pending case which conflicts with the provisions of this order.
A parent who is a party to a pending Domestic Relations action shall include the other parent’s name on the school contact list when registering or enrolling a child in school in Brevard County, unless that parent has a specific court order relieving the parent of this obligation.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: cc11d628086cb531b274d781504b091cd8d0a2fb03aaf0b7ecf72a22db5b213a (92647 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.