Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from 18-04-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Galluzzo should not hear cases in which attorney Andrew Zelman Bar #437328, and Christina D’Amato-Miller, Bar #930741 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which attorney Andrew Zelman Bar #437328, and Christina D’Amato-Miller, Bar #930741 appears as attorney of record, for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Galluzzo should not hear cases in which attorney Andrew Zelman Bar #437328, and Christina D’Amato-Miller, Bar #930741 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which attorney Andrew Zelman Bar #437328, and Christina D’Amato-Miller, Bar #930741 appears as attorney of record, for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: b9df8e8966cb9ed954d6c5b5c5e6de650cf0f4e99330fa95b8795709dd890ae3 (110145 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.