Loading…
5 verbatim mandatory provisions from 22-08-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • WHEREAS, Florida Rules of Court (Rule 2.050) states that the chief judge “shall exercise administrative supervision over all courts within the judicial circuit in the exercise of judicial power and over the judges and officers of the court” and "shall develop an administrative plan for the efficient and proper administration of all courts within that circuit", which includes a "mandatory periodic review of the status of the inmates of the county jail;" and WHEREAS, standardization of Seminole County's Arrest Affidavit has increased efficiency, effectiveness, statistical information and sharing of information among various state, county, and municipalagencies; and WHEREAS, standardization of Seminole County's Arrest Affidavit has decreased inefficiency, court-related costs, labor hours, redundancy, data entry and clerical mistakes; and WHEREAS, presently over ninety-five percent (95%) of all arrests booked into the Seminole County John E. • Admin. 2.423(d) 1 The filer of an initial charging document shall prominently indicate the existence of confidential crime victim information pursuant to article I, section 16 of the Florida Constitution. • If the filer indicates the existence of confidential crime victim information, the clerk of the court shall designate and maintain the confidentiality of any such information contained within the initial charging document; and WHEREAS, the initial charging document filed in a criminal case is typically filed by law enforcement by way of an arrest affidavit; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Fla. • Admin. 2.423(d)1 notification of the presence of confidential victim information within an arrest report where it is the initial charging document, should be prominently displayed on the face of the arrest affidavit; and WHEREAS, standardization of Seminole County's Arrest Affidavit to include a uniform and standardized means to alert the Clerk of the Court to the presence of Confidential Victim Information being located within the Arrest Affidavit will increase efficiency, effectiveness and assist in proper review by the Clerk of the Court to said information; and WHEREAS, such notice shall be made by use of a check box on the face of the arrest affidavit, THEREFORE, AFTER DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Standard Affidavit of Arrest attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby adopted for use by all law enforcement agencies within Seminole County effective immediately. • Statements made by defendant prior to, during, and after arrest as related to each charge:
WHEREAS, Florida Rules of Court (Rule 2.050) states that the chief judge “shall exercise administrative supervision over all courts within the judicial circuit in the exercise of judicial power and over the judges and officers of the court” and "shall develop an administrative plan for the efficient and proper administration of all courts within that circuit", which includes a "mandatory periodic review of the status of the inmates of the county jail;" and WHEREAS, standardization of Seminole County's Arrest Affidavit has increased efficiency, effectiveness, statistical information and sharing of information among various state, county, and municipalagencies; and WHEREAS, standardization of Seminole County's Arrest Affidavit has decreased inefficiency, court-related costs, labor hours, redundancy, data entry and clerical mistakes; and WHEREAS, presently over ninety-five percent (95%) of
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 67bf4d18d4c21401dee2a93d133f574419d475606087240c825105ac023b2de3 (201986 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The 17th Circuit's circuit-wide AI disclosure/certification mandate (Jan 2026, twice amended) was VACATED in its entirety effective June 15, 2026 by Chief Judge Phillips's AO 2026-19-Gen, expressly citing the statewide framework (AOSC26-12; Rule 2.515(d)(2), SC2026-0673). Several division procedure pages still cite the vacated order.
Every circuit-civil case reviewed within 120 days of commencement and assigned a track (complex, streamlined, or general); case management orders required; firm continuance policy; sanctions for missed deadlines. Rescinds AO 21-09.
Circuit-civil hearing-availability standards: motion calendars ~2 weeks from request; 15-30 min special sets within 45-60 days; longer special sets scale.