Loading…
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from 23-33-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Galluzzo should not hear cases in which attorney Maria Ianni Cari, Bar#491780 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which attorney Maria Ianni Cari, Bar#491780 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders, unless said attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect. • If an attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect, the case shall not be reassigned to the next judge in rotation.
Galluzzo should not hear cases in which attorney Maria Ianni Cari, Bar#491780 appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which attorney Maria Ianni Cari, Bar#491780 appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders, unless said attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: cfbd2995e7ae49ba6f110da5532fdc3b4ebcf38422573ed338d35316deb2844a (23634 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.