Loading…
2 verbatim mandatory provisions from 25-22-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Herr should not hear cases in which attorney Michael Mendoza, Bar # 1020250, appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which attorney Michael Mendoza, Bar # 1020250, appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders, unless said attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect. • If an attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect, the case shall not be reassigned to the next judge in rotation.
Herr should not hear cases in which attorney Michael Mendoza, Bar # 1020250, appears, it is ORDERED that all pending or newly filed cases in which attorney Michael Mendoza, Bar # 1020250, appears as attorney of record for any party shall be reassigned to the next judge in rotation pursuant to pending or existing administrative orders, unless said attorney files a Notice of Appearance in a case with a known recusal order in effect.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 5b0d9af4845507682d9512db1629378c6c70b8e59cef267e5bfbb4b0389f3c0b (91422 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.