8 verbatim mandatory provisions from 26-10.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • WHEREAS, information generated by AI must have appropriate human oversight, including verification of factual claims and citation checks; • WHEREAS, self-represented litigants must adhere to the same procedural rules and applicable statutes as attorneys, Gutierrez v. • WHEREAS, all filings submitted to the Court must comply with the duty of candor to the tribunal, and the responsibility for accuracy rests solely with the filing party, regardless of the technology used; and WHEREAS, transparency regarding the use of AI promotes accountability, fairness, and public confidence in the judicial process. • Mandatory Disclosure of AI Use Any attorney or self-represented litigant who uses any generative artificial intelligence tool in the preparation of a pleading, motion, memorandum, response, proposed order, or other court record, must disclose such use on the face of the filing. • The filing shall include a statement substantially in the following form: “Generative artificial intelligence was used in the preparation of this filing. • All AI-generated content shall be deemed the work product of the filing party. • Prohibited Conduct The following conduct is prohibited: submission of fictitious, fabricated, or hallucinated legal authority, statutes, quotations, or facts; reliance on AI-generated citations without independent verification; misrepresentation of AI-generated content as independently researched authority; or failure to disclose the use of AI as required by this Administrative Order. • This Administrative Order shall take effect immediately and remain in effect until modified or rescinded.
WHEREAS, information generated by AI must have appropriate human oversight, including verification of factual claims and citation checks;
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 1cce877cafc62c8d56c0b837c533d54d8033d766cf5edac81656d3da52b96367 (196054 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
The Eighteenth Judicial Circuit (Seminole and Brevard) requires cover letters in PDF format and proposed orders in .docx format using DJMCA formatting codes, submitted through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal.
Florida attorneys must file court documents electronically through the statewide Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (myflcourtaccess.com). Self-represented litigants may e-file through the same portal. Local circuits layer their own formatting and routing quirks on top.
Effective June 15, 2026, every signer of a Florida court filing — attorney or self-represented — represents that "the legal authorities identified exist and are accurately cited," with express sanctions (reprimand, contempt, striking, dismissal, costs, fees) for violations. Companion order AOSC26-12 preempts ALL circuit- and judge-level AI disclosure/certification requirements.