Loading…
6 verbatim mandatory provisions from 26-12-s.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • Uniform Case Numbering The Clerk of Court for Seminole County shall assign case numbers in strict compliance with the Uniform Case Numbering System approved by the Florida Supreme Court, as it exists now or may be amended in the future. • Initial Assignment of Cases All newly filed cases shall be assigned a case number by the Clerk at the time of filing that accurately reflects: • Any substantive change to a case number, division, or judicial assignment that is not purely clerical shall be made only upon court order or as otherwise authorized by law or administrative order. -- 1 of 2 -- 2 IV. • Case Number Reassignment and Related Clerk Procedures Nothing in this Administrative Order shall be construed to: • The Clerk shall implement any reassignment or modification of cases only as authorized by court order or applicable administrative directive. • Effective Date This Administrative Order shall take effect immediately and remain in effect until modified or rescinded.
Uniform Case Numbering The Clerk of Court for Seminole County shall assign case numbers in strict compliance with the Uniform Case Numbering System approved by the Florida Supreme Court, as it exists now or may be amended in the future.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 85288e3fce99bac422ba93761ff6686131be7753ae2b1877b61f8b90ce6c91db (106947 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.