Loading…
3 verbatim mandatory provisions from 82-19.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • (1) The office of the State Attorney shall establish a procedure to monitor those cases in which the Defendant was arrested and released prior to the time of the second appearance of the Defendant and those cases where at any time after an arrest of a Defendant, the State does not file an information but subsequently elects to do so and in such cases, the State shall promptly inform the Office of the Clerk of Court of the original arrest date by prominently stamping the Information "SPEEDY TRIAL CRITICAL - Arrest Date " (Attachment 1). • (2) The Criminal Law Division of the Office of the Clerk shall give priority to such filings issuing Summons or Capias stamped by the Clerk "SPEEDY TRIAL CRITICAL" and shall promptly deliver them into the hands of the Sheriff for service. • (3) The Sheriff's Department shall also give priority to service of all process so stamped and attach thereto its "Service Attempt" form No.
(1) The office of the State Attorney shall establish a procedure to monitor those cases in which the Defendant was arrested and released prior to the time of the second appearance of the Defendant and those cases where at any time after an arrest of a Defendant, the State does not file an information but subsequently elects to do so and in such cases, the State shall promptly inform the Office of the Clerk of Court of the original arrest date by prominently stamping the Information "SPEEDY TRIAL CRITICAL - Arrest Date " (Attachment 1).
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 90e813dc6600ffcae83c800cc8ffcfc8eda0acd12cf1967fc70c7c37bc6b08bf (83958 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.