Loading…
4 verbatim mandatory provisions from 90-91.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • This order shall apply to resolve intercircuit scheduling conflicts. 2. • The judges affected by an intercircuit scheduling conflict shall initially confer and determine priorities considering such factors as the age of the case, the number of parties and attorneys involved, the estimated time needed for trial, and the availability of witnesses. • The following priorities shall apply in the event that the judges affected cannot resolve an intercircuit scheduling conflict: • Criminal defendants in custody shall have priority over other criminal defendants.
This order shall apply to resolve intercircuit scheduling conflicts. 2.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 98ea0cceced1cb825a120eb5c7b622d2026e7edfef711f6807bc28a4be7187bf (45158 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
2 verbatim requirements on discovery.
3 verbatim requirements on discovery.