Loading…
10 verbatim mandatory provisions from 91-79-amd.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order's own text layer, harvested 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. Only sentences containing mandatory language (shall, must, may not, no later than, within N) are reproduced — the full document is in custody and is the controlling text. • When choosing not to participate the Public Defender shall file a "Notice of Intent Not To Participate In Discovery" with the court and the State. • Further, the agreement provides that the prosecuting attorney shall furnish a Statement of Particulars without request in those cases when the Public Defender is appointed and an Indictment or Information has been filed. • In all Brevard and Seminole County criminal court cases where the Public Defender is appointed, except where the Public Defender -- 1 of 3 -- has filed a "Notice of Intent Not to Participate in Discovery, the State Attorney and Public Defender shall fully participate in discovery as provided by the Criminal Rules of Procedure. • The State Attorney shall disclose and permit inspection, copying, testing, and photographing of all material provided for in Rule 3.220(b), F.R.Cr.P., within the State's possession or control within fifteen (15) days after an Information is filed or after an Answer to Demand for Discovery is filed, whichever occurs first. • Should the prosecution not require the filing of an Informative, as in the case of criminal traffic offenses, the fifteen (15) day period shall commence upon arraignment of the defendant. • The Public Defender will notify the State of its intent to copy all available discovery, and the State shall make the same available the next working day.Discovery materials actually obtained by a secretary for the Public Defender's office will be deemed to have been demanded and received irrespective of any written notice to the contrary. • Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), shall disclose to the Public Defender any material information within the State's possession or control which tends to negate the guilt of the accused as to the offense charged. • If, subsequent to compliance with this order, the prosecuting attorney discovers additional witnesses or material which he would have been under a duty to disclose or produce at the time of such previous compliance, he shall promptly disclose or produce such witnesses or material in the same manner as required under this order for initial discovery. • In any case where an Indictment or Information has been filed, the prosecuting attorney shall also automatically advise the Public Defender as to the time, date and place of the commission of the alleged offenses as specifically and definitely as possible as well as whether or not the State intends to prosecute the accused as an actual participant or as an aider and abettor under F.S. 777.011. • If a defendant elects to participate in discovery, either through filing the appropriate notice or by participating in the discovery process outlined in this agreement, the defendant through his Public Defender shall comply with all requirement of Rule 3.220(d) F.R.Cr.P.
When choosing not to participate the Public Defender shall file a "Notice of Intent Not To Participate In Discovery" with the court and the State.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: f40e5ef99ff2d7e98547c18a0f749eb39e468cc75750713cbc0a9797eb4dfd08 (69869 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it.
Every party setting a hearing in Division AO must first confer in a good-faith effort to resolve the matter, and every hearing notice must include a certificate of that conferral. The division instructions state that conferral requires counsel to actually talk.
Under the 2025 case-management amendments, a movant must confer with the opposing party in a good-faith effort to resolve a nondispositive motion before filing it, and must include a certificate of conferral.
CV-E layers a second conferral on top of Rule 1.202: certify conferral before filing the motion (Exhibit A) and again before scheduling it for hearing (Exhibit B).