6 verbatim mandatory provisions from 94-27.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • Law clerks may serve as members, officers, or directors of organizations or governmental agencies devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice. • Law clerks may make themselves available to the public at large for speaking engagements and public appearances designed to enhance the public's knowledge of the operation of the court system. • Law clerks may serve as officers, directors, trustees or nonlegal advisors of educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations and solicit funds for any such organization subject to the following limitations: • (2) It does not require any act, including the entry of an appearance in a court, that would suggest that the position of law clerk is being misused, that preferential treatment is being sought by virtue of the holding of that position, or that would otherwise be inconsistent with the law clerk's primary responsibility to the court for which the law clerk is employed; and (3) So long as such activity does not have actual conflict or appear in conflict with court duties or will not reflect adversely on the court or create the appearance of impropriety. • Law clerks may receive compensation and reimbursement of expenses for all extra-official activities permitted by this Code, if the source of such payments does not influence or give the appearance of influencing the law clerks in the performance of official duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety, subject to the following restrictions: • Law clerks should make and file such reports as may be prescribed by law.
Law clerks may serve as members, officers, or directors of organizations or governmental agencies devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: d566cf61db40adc09821bc6ec37cab9db22b4f3e013b33bcdd0cca66743f6fde (141253 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 6 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1987-09.