Loading…
1 verbatim mandatory provision from Brevard Early Childhood Court.
Eighteenth Judicial Circuit. Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
• Prior or current offenses may disqualify a parent(s) from participation if the evidence demonstrates the parent(s) cannot be managed safely or effectively; however, the history or allegations against one parent need not disqualify a second parent. • Because an Early Childhood Court status hearing is a non-statutory hearing, all issues to be considered at the hearing, including but not limited to: visitation, sibling contact, services to parents, reunification, case plan amendments, and goal changes, must be raised explicitly in the notice of hearing sent to the parties unless notice is waived by the parties. F. Team Training
Prior or current offenses may disqualify a parent(s) from participation if the evidence demonstrates the parent(s) cannot be managed safely or effectively; however, the history or allegations against one parent need not disqualify a second parent.
Reviewer note: Document sha256: 3ff6ad381ee7989a876e475d13fa822bfe8a14c6338930c748a0f49c1c702d04 (144068 bytes). BenchPath harvested this circuit itself because no research corpus existed for it. Extraction is conservative: mandatory-language sentences only, so this rule is a faithful subset of the order, never a summary of it. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. | Scope corrected 2026-08-03: the 18th numbers county-specific orders with -b (Brevard) and -s (Seminole); unsuffixed orders are circuit-wide. This rule was bulk-tagged to one county at harvest; the court's own numbering convention now controls. Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]
9 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-10.
6 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1997-13.