1 verbatim requirement extracted from 19330-01__2026-06.pdf, across 1 topic.
Nineteenth Judicial Circuit (Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, St. Lucie). Check the order's own effective and rescission dates before relying on it. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used anywhere in this chain. HEARING TIME & ARGUMENT LIMITS • IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE N INETEENTH J UDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MAR TIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. L UCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2026-06 IN RE: RESCISSION OF ADMI NISTRATIVE O RDER 2025-10; USE OF ARTI FICIAL I NTELLIGENCE IN COURT FILINGS On May 28, 2026, the Supreme Court of Florida issued AOS C26-12, In re: Representations by Signers of Filings, and amended Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515(d)(2) pursuant to In re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515, No. SC2026-0673 (Fla. May 28, 2026), both effective June 15, 2026. Together, these actions establish a uniform statewide framework governing artificial int elligence disclosure and certification requirements in court filings. AOSC26-12 expressly provides that circuit courts may not impose such requirements through local administrative orders or other means, and that courts should instead rely on amended Rule 2.515(d)(2). Accordingly, Administrative Order 2025-10, In re: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Court Filings, is hereby RESCINDED, effective June 15, 2026, at 12:01 a.m. All pa rties and counsel s ha ll r eview an d comply w ith Florida Rule of General P ractice and Procedure 2.515, as amended and effective June 15, 2026, and as may be amended thereafter. C onsistent with that Rule, signers are reminded that they bear full responsibility for verifying the existence and accuracy of every legal authority cited in a filing, and that violations may result in sanctions as set forth therein. DONE AND ORDERED at Ft. Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida on this 16th day of June 2026. _____________________________ Charles A. Schwab Chief Judge Copies to: All Circuit and County Judges Court Administration Clerks of Court General Magistrates and Hearing Officers
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE N INETEENTH J UDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MAR TIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. L UCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2026-06 IN RE: RESCISSION OF ADMI NISTRATIVE O RDER 2025-10; USE OF ARTI FICIAL I NTELLIGENCE IN COURT FILINGS On May 28, 2026, the Supreme Court of Florida issued AOS C26-12, In re: Representations by Signers of Filings, and amended Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515(d)(2) pursuant to In re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515, No. SC2026-0673 (Fla. May 28, 2026), both effective June 15, 2026. Together, these actions establish a uniform statewide framework governing artificial int elligence disclosure and certification requirements in court filings. AOSC26-12 expressly provides that circuit courts may not impose such requirements through local adm
Reviewer note: Document sha256: ffe24a0637174ec4bdd6542f5c51fb520ce85932eeff5954b491e5142b60c013. One rule per order rather than per topic, so an order's requirements stay together. Published during the completeness pass.
1 verbatim requirement published by Palm Beach magistrate 01 on hearing time & argument limits.
1 verbatim requirement published by Palm Beach magistrate 02 on hearing time & argument limits.
1 verbatim requirement published by Palm Beach magistrate 03 on hearing time & argument limits.