Loading…
26 verbatim requirements from admin. order AO 2.36 - Court Interpreters for Court or Court-odered Proceedings (1/29/16) [Judicial].
20th Judicial Circuit. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from https://www.ca.cjis20.org/pdf/ao/ao_2_36.pdf, harvested 2026-07-25; whitespace normalised only. • Upon the initiation of an action in the Courts of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, it shall be the responsibility of the party or the party's counsel requesting a Court Interpreter for a non- • If a Court Interpreter is being requested for a non-English- speaking or limited-English-proficient child, witness, or victim, it shall be the responsibility of the party or the party's counsel to bring this matter to a trial judge's attention immediately upon learning of the child's, witness', or victim's need for a Court Interpreter and sufficiently in advance of the court proceeding at which the child, witness, or victim will testify or be present. • It should be noted that a person is not necessarily non-English-speaking or limited-English-proficient simply because that person may not speak grammatically correct English, or may speak too softly or too swiftly. • Interpreter at public expense for all future court or court-ordered proceedings at which that person is to be present, or for a child, witness or victim at trial or an evidentiary hearing, the trial judge shall make this finding on the record or enter a written order. • After a determination has been made by a trial judge that a non-English-speaking or limited-English-proficient person is entitled to a Court Interpreter at public expense, the person, or counsel representing the person, shall notify the AOC's Court Interpreter Services of the need for a Court Interpreter for court proceedings, and court-ordered mediations, arbitrations and competency examinations, by submitting written notifications to the AOC's Court Interpreter • The "Notification of Need of Court Interpreter" form and instructions for submission shall be posted on the AOC's website at www.ca.cjis20.org, Assistance is also available by calling the AOC's Court • Form" and instructions for submission shall be posted on the AOC's website at www.ca.cjis20.org. • Advance notification of the need for a Court Interpreter for a court or court-ordered proceeding must be provided to the AOC's Court Interpreter Services, or to the ADA • At least 2 business days advance notice (excluding weekends and holidays). • At least 7 business days advance notice (excluding weekends and holidays). • At least 7 days advance notice, or immediately upon receipt of notice of less than 7 days notice of the proceeding was provided. • Interpreter shall be made for First Appearance and any other court proceeding that, by its nature, involves limited notice, such as proceedings under the Baker Act or the Marchman Act. • Likewise, the AOC may not necessarily have the resources to always and automatically provide "stand-by" Court Interpreters for events such as First Appearance, arraignments, or other court dockets in anticipation of a Court Interpreter potentially being needed. • Due process provisions require that the Court provide and incur the budgetary expense of Court Interpreters for court and court-ordered proceedings (including mediation, arbitration, and competency examinations), as may be appropriate, but do not require that the Court incur the budgetary expense or provide interpreter scheduling services to other publicly funded agencies (i.e. • Examples of non- court-ordered proceedings or events are depositions, in-custody conferences and visits Gail or holding cells), and office conferences and visits, which may or may not require the retention of an interpreter meeting the more stringent Florida Supreme Court requirements for Court • Interpreters. 1 For these types of non-court-ordered events taking place between other publicly funded agencies, court-appointed counsel, privately-retained attorneys, clients, parties, family members, witnesses, or victims, the scheduling and retaining of interpreters shall be the responsibility of those agencies, attorneys, or parties. • All Court Interpreters providing spoken language interpretation services for court or court-ordered proceedings must be qualified in accordance with the Florida Rules for • All Court Interpreters providing interpreter services for deaf persons for court or court- ordered proceedings must be qualified and certified by the National Registry of Interpreters for 1 Though a deposition is considered a "court-related proceeding" requiring that a Court Interpreter meeting the qualifications of the Florida Supreme Court be utilized (Rule 14.100, Fla. • In addition, for the purpose of providing verification and accountability for the use of public funds, contract Court Interpreters are required to submit with all invoices the "Contract Interpreter Sign-in/Sign-out Sheet" provided by the AOC's Court • Pursuant to Florida Supreme Court rule amendments, Court Interpreters must meet minimum requirements and must be registered with the Office of State Courts Administrator. • Registered Court Interpreters must also be designated by the State of Florida as certified (having passed full oral performance state-certifying examination available for specific language) or language-skilled (no full oral performance state-certifying examination currently available for specific language, but having passing an approved oral proficiency interview), or must be actively and diligently pursuing designation as certified or language-skilled or, alternatively, as provisionally-approved (attaining a minimum score on the full oral performance state-certifying examination, but at a level below that required for full certification). • These findings shall apply only to the specific proceeding and shall not extend to subsequent proceedings without additional findings of good cause and qualification for each subsequent proceeding. • English-proficient person, or other unusual or specific exigent circumstances given the demands of the case; and c. the proposed interpreter is competent to interpret the proceedings and asserts under oath that he or she is able, either in direct or relay/intermediary interpretation, to communicate effectively in the languages in which interpreter services are required. • Administrative Order 2.36 11 - -- 11 of 12 -- officer shall advise the accused on the record of the fact that the proposed interpreter is not certified, language-skilled, or provisionally-approved, and the accused's objection or waiver of objection shall be on the record. • The accused's objection or waiver of objection shall apply only to the specific proceeding and shall not extend to subsequent proceedings without giving the accused the opportunity to object or waive any objection on the record for each subsequent proceeding. • This Administrative Order shall be effective March 1, 2016, and supercedes any prior administrative orders relating to court interpreters, including the "Order Establishing Protocol for the Employment and Attendance of Interpreters for Criminal Court Proceedings in Lee County," entered March 28, 2000.
Upon the initiation of an action in the Courts of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, it shall be the responsibility of the party or the party's counsel requesting a Court Interpreter for a non-
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 16d89716fe9bcc2744ea8ed77d0e59ad1a53628086709af491cb5f80655ad64d. Extracted from the order's own text layer.
Judge Bell caps motions and responses at 5 pages for UMC hearings and 12 pages for special-set hearings.
Judge Alijewicz requires every motion for attorney's fees and/or costs to attach a document detailing time records — no records, no fee award.
Judge Corlew bars informal contact: every communication with the Court must be in writing, filed with the Clerk, with copies furnished to all parties — and no calls to the JA to schedule or cancel UMC.