Loading…
5 verbatim requirements from admin. order (unlisted) [unlisted] OrderGrantingFathersMotionToDismissWithoutPrejudice.
20th Judicial Circuit. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from https://www.ca.cjis20.org/pdf/judge/OrderGrantingFathersMotionToDismissWithoutPrejudice.pdf, harvested 2026-07-25; whitespace normalised only. • These allegations do not amount to ultimate facts showing that a substantial, unanticipated change in circumstances has occurred since the judgment. • These allegations do not show that the best interests of the children will be promoted by a proposed modification. • A claim for relief must allege ultimate facts that show the pleader is entitled to relief allowed by law. • Regarding her request to change the parental responsibility order, the allegations of the mother’s supplemental petition do not meet the standard of Wade v. • A petitioner requesting “modification carries the extraordinary burden of proving (1) a substantial and material change in circumstances, and (2) that the best interests of the child will be promoted by such modification.” Id. at 933. “Furthermore, the substantial change must be one that was not reasonably contemplated at the time of the original judgment.” Id. at 930, FN 2.
These allegations do not amount to ultimate facts showing that a substantial, unanticipated change in circumstances has occurred since the judgment.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 657ec58961fd876f339219f7c3f7b50b6b6ee8985ddeefa8a6c12e20d9b26a43. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Text layer cleaned 2026-09-08 (Phase 3a): page markers removed; wording untouched.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.