Loading…
2 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1974-05.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=1974-05&filed=10%2F04%2F1974&h=3980cdc7ff1e59f7), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • This Administrative Order is entered because there has arisen a question concerning the performance of certain duties by the Deputy Clerk in traffic cases in the County Court. • Effective October 1, 1974, Section 332.25 Florida Statutes authorized the Court to enter an Order for reinstatement of a driving privilege on a temporary basis where any licensed driver is convicted for a first violation of driving under the influence of alcoholic beverages, model glue, etc. The Court Order for reinstatement is to be on a form provided by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. A number of the forms of Court Orders were distributed to each County Court Judge and a copy of said form is attached hereto and made a part hereof for the purposes of clarification. • The matter to be resolved by this Administrative Order has been precipitated by a Deputy Clerk refusing to comply with the direction of a County Court Judge in open court to fill out the information required in the Court Order form for the judge's signature. • After considering the matter and being fully advised in the premises, the Court finds that the information required to be filled out in the Court Order form is traditionally in the hands of the Deputy Clerk during court proceedings. • This information is included on the traffic citation as well as the drivers license of the person appearing before the court and further, that the filling out of said form by the Deputy Clerk for the judge's signature not only expedites and facilitates the handling of the court's business but that such a function is ministerial in nature and is such a duty assigned by the Court as necessary to carry out the performance of the judicial function of the Court. (See County Court Administrative Order No.4, paragraph IV, dated June 21, 1974, as amended.) Therefore, it is ADJUDGED: The Clerk of the Court or his Deputy when requested by a judge in open court shall fill in the information required on the Court Order form provided to the judge by the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, a copy of which is attached hereto, when said Court Order relates to the case instantly pending before the judge at the time of the request. Thereafter the form shall be handed to the judge for his signature and delivered to the person appearing before the Court.
The Clerk of the Court or his Deputy when requested by a judge in open court shall fill In the information required on the Court Order form provided to the judge by the Department: of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, a copy of which is attached hereto, when said Court Order relates to the case instantly pending before the judge at the the time of the request.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 3980cdc7ff1e59f7694602a2e544157d109595e4ce8a7f7235efaf2c461e086a. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 3980cdc7ff1e59f7694602a2e544157d109595e4ce8a7f7235efaf2c461e086a; 4 paragraph(s) were still too corrupt to use. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 3980cdc7ff1e59f7694602a2e544157d109595e4ce8a7f7235efaf2c461e086a; 5 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.] [' AUDIT 2026-08-26: double-apostrophes adjudicated SOURCE-FAITHFUL - the custody text transcribes the scanned order's own typewriter quote marks / OCR of quote glyphs (the Galveston p6/p7 precedent). KEEP; never blind-fix.] Text recomposed 2026-09-08 (Phase 3d): read against the official print (Duval Clerk viewer PDF) through the vision lane; wording unchanged.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.