Loading…
2 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1985-51.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=1985-51&filed=11%2F05%2F1985&h=9f0e941069d9fd3b), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • WHEREAS, Section 316.6135, Florida Statutes, effective October 1, 1985, provides, inter alia: (1) No parent, legal guardian, or other person responsible for a child younger than 6 years of age shall leave such child unattended or unsupervised in a motor vehicle for a period in excess of 15 minutes; however, no such person shall leave a child unattended for any period of time if the motor of the vehicle is running or the health of the child is in danger. • (2) Any person who violates the provisions of subsection (1) is guilty of a noncriminal traffic infraction, punishable by a fine of: (a) Not more than $100; or (b) Not less than $50 and not more than $500 if the motor of the vehicle was running or the health of the child is in danger at the time of the violation.
it is ORDERED that any case cited for violation of Section 316.6135, Florida Statutes, the person cited shall be required to appear in court for determination of guilt or innocence and the fine to be imposed for said violation, the Court is direct-pH and the Clerk of
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 9f0e941069d9fd3ba4517691aa783b9e2343fc56963659ea9d90cc1c51223b20. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 9f0e941069d9fd3ba4517691aa783b9e2343fc56963659ea9d90cc1c51223b20. [VERIFY WAVE 2026-08-04: order renders only inside the Duval Clerk's application and returned the loading placeholder on the final capture pass, or is a scanned image with no text layer (OCR class); custody holds the document bytes. The July-verified excerpt stands; confidence held at medium pending patient re-capture or OCR. Named reason, not a silent gap.] [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 9f0e941069d9fd3ba4517691aa783b9e2343fc56963659ea9d90cc1c51223b20; 2 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.] Text recomposed 2026-09-08 (Phase 3d): read against the official print (Duval Clerk viewer PDF) through the vision lane; wording unchanged.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.