2 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1988-08 (a further document filed under the same order number).
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=1988-08&filed=01%2F31%2F1991&h=d8be5fd0b20c73a7), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • IN RE; CAPIASES __ » ’ ' ¤"'·’<··~,·¢¤-·9···¤ I |:—%t _ _ AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO- 88*8 cuaucmcanoouqg yr; · ‘ l This Administrative Order amends Administrative Orders ~ g Nos. 87-18, 88-5, and 88-8 in order to hold the following _ . = I _ . capiases in abeyance until a review of the cases underlying r |if . these capiases is completed by the State Attorney's Officezl _ —r _Qv ' A. All cases, including violations of probation, · ' _ containing only misdemeanori, municipal ordinance, or criminal p traffic charges bearing a -1965 or prior case number h and · , -4 i issued before January 1, 1990, except where DUI offenses ,, ` _1 arc included. • V ?if L ‘ ORDERED that said motion be granted until January ‘ ' Y. `_ 3l, 1991, or until further order of this Court. During _ N this ` period, personnel of. the Jfacksonville Sheriff's Office T11? rl. | y are authorized and ordered to not execute ori in any way I ; · facilitate the execution of the above-referenced capiases unless otherwise ordered by this _Court, except when the _ Q M
By the State Attorney's Office shall report to this Court regarding the progress of the review of said underlying cases.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: e264bb81bb39ea575da8aafe6d0bd18f39b0e928133deb1c50dc901520a9c4fc. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 1988-08. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 cf170162747acea78f03dcaa8c234610e240f260ff026d2b28f441ca0a92e201; 1 paragraph(s) were still too corrupt to use. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 cf170162747acea78f03dcaa8c234610e240f260ff026d2b28f441ca0a92e201; 2 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.]
27 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2004-23.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 2003-06.