Loading…
5 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2004-04.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=2004-04&filed=06%2F28%2F2004&h=94e99eae3152168f), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY FLORIDA. gg i F I L E D P3 JUN 2 8 2004 QI ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2004-4 tl g ,. ,.` .7,,,%»- CLERK CIRCTIIT COURT S RE: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE REGARDING RULES TRANSFERRING CASES BETWEEN SUMMARY PROCEDURE AND COUNTY COURT CIVIL "‘ IN DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. • NOW THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as Chief Judge and pursuant to the Florida Rules ofludicial Administration, it is, ORDERED: l. Any case transferred between the Summary Procedure and County Civil sections of the County Court of Duval County, Florida, shall remain assigned to the same Division that received the original assignment for the subject matter of the case. • 2. This Order shall take effect immediately and remain in effect until further Order of the Court and all terms and conditions set forth in this Administrative Order shall apply unless Page l of 2 • Book 11901 Page E12? otherwise ordered by the Court. • 3. This Order shall be recorded in the Official Records of Duval County in the State of Florida, and the Clerk ofCourt shall furnish Certified Copies to the Jacksonville Bar Association.
This Order shall be recorded in the Official Records of Duval County in the State of Florida, and the Clerk of Court shall furnish Certified Copies to the Jacksonville Bar Association.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 94e99eae3152168f5372da8eea795134853fc9cedf9f12a0762eca6a4ce4d939. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 94e99eae3152168f5372da8eea795134853fc9cedf9f12a0762eca6a4ce4d939; 1 paragraph(s) were still too corrupt to use. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 94e99eae3152168f5372da8eea795134853fc9cedf9f12a0762eca6a4ce4d939; 5 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.]
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.