Loading…
2 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2008-01.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=2008-01&filed=02%2F12%2F2008&h=0230976c722bbc4f), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • ORDERED: 1. The Trial Judges of the Fourth Judicial Circuit are hereby designated as the responsible Judges to determine if a fee in excess of the flat fee set forth under the General Appropriations Act • 2. This Order shall take effect immediately, nunc pro tunc, and shall remain in efect until further Order ofthe Court, and all requirements set forth in this Administrative Order shall apply unless otherwise ordered by the Court. g 3. This Order shall be recorded in the Official Records ofDuval, Clay and Nassau Counties 2 ~ in the State of Florida, and copies shall be fumished by the Clerk of the Court to the local bar associations of each county. • V . . DONE AND ORDERED at Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, this [Z. day of February, 2008. . DONALD R. MORAN, JR. . CHIEF JUDGE _ Copies to: 0 All Judges of the Fourth Judicial Circuit The Honorable Robert M. Foster, Administrative Judge, Nassau County The Honorable William A. Wilkes, Administrative Judge, Clay County Caroline C. Emery, Court Counsel Fourth Circuit Court Law Library, Duval County
This Order shall be recorded in the Offcial Records of Duval, Clay and Nassau Counties in the State of Florida, and copies shall be furnished by the Clerk of the Court to the local bar associations of each county.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 0230976c722bbc4f6c0600bfde17a129d46439da95fbaeb81f4c0b95e41143a4. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 0230976c722bbc4f6c0600bfde17a129d46439da95fbaeb81f4c0b95e41143a4. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 0230976c722bbc4f6c0600bfde17a129d46439da95fbaeb81f4c0b95e41143a4; 3 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.]
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.