Loading…
5 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2008-02.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=2008-02&filed=03%2F05%2F2008&h=e5b7c74a8108e0bc), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • (C) That regardless of the nu1nber of individuals participating from each entity, each _ entity shall be limited to one vote in order to ensure an equal representation and voice for each in the Project’s decision making; I ` (D) That any discrepancy as to the implementation of the requirements of this I _ . Administrative Order that may arise during the operation of the Project shall be addressed on a • OR BK 14408 PAGE 881 ‘ case-by-case basis by the Chief Judge or his designee; (E) That this Order shall take effect immediately and remain in effect until further Order of the Court, and all terms and conditions set forth in this Administrative Order shall apply unless otherwise ordered by the Court;. • (F) That this Order shall be recorded in the Official Records of Duval County in the State of Florida, and copies furnished by the Clerk of the Courts to the Jacksonville Bar Association. • DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Jacksonville, Duval County, Florida, this day of , 2008. ’ DONALD R. MORAN, JR.
(F) That this Order shall be recorded in the Official Records of Duval County in the State of Florida, and copies furnished by the Clerk of the Courts to the Jacksonville Bar Association.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: e5b7c74a8108e0bcbe935b7a3a39f40e4435f20c7597d2289d8753ce1da7fbfa. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 e5b7c74a8108e0bcbe935b7a3a39f40e4435f20c7597d2289d8753ce1da7fbfa. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 e5b7c74a8108e0bcbe935b7a3a39f40e4435f20c7597d2289d8753ce1da7fbfa; 4 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.]
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.