Loading…
6 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2022-05.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=2022-05&filed=04%2F14%2F2022&h=71d5a24ebc868b2c), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • NOW THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as the Chief Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit and pursuant to the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, it is ORDERED that: The cases listed in Attachment A are consolidated and hereby identified as In re." Clayman/Allergan Litigation until further order of the Court. • The Clerk shall assign a specific parent case number that shall be used-for filings in all , the consolidated cases. Every case number will be a subset of the parent case number. _ This includes the cases listed in Attachment A and any pending or future cases related to In re: Clayman/Allergan Litigation. • The parent case is designated as 16-2022-CA-006729-XXXX and as such, the Clerk will assign a new case number to the cases listed in Attachment A, that is a subset under the parent case number and to assign all new cases a case number that is a subset of the parent case number. , " The Clerk is directed to include this Administrative Order on the docket in the previously filed cases’ original case number to indicate the new case number by which the case can now be found. • These cases shall be reassigned to Complex Civil Litigation Division CV-K. • For all cases filed after the date of this Order, the Court implements and directs that the Standing Order, Attachment B, be filed with the complaint, either as an exhibit to the complaint or as a separate filing with the complaint to notify the Clerk and all the parties that a newly filed case is part of the In re: Clayman/Allergan Litigation.
The Clerk shall assign a specific parent case number that shall be used for filings in all the consolidated cases.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 71d5a24ebc868b2c36e32c0237510cdf2885b3d3f0ce2cfaa93d1b7bf289bdc8. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 71d5a24ebc868b2c36e32c0237510cdf2885b3d3f0ce2cfaa93d1b7bf289bdc8; 53 paragraph(s) were still too corrupt to use. [VERIFY WAVE 2026-08-04: order renders only inside the Duval Clerk's application and returned the loading placeholder on the final capture pass, or is a scanned image with no text layer (OCR class); custody holds the document bytes. The July-verified excerpt stands; confidence held at medium pending patient re-capture or OCR. Named reason, not a silent gap.] [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 71d5a24ebc868b2c36e32c0237510cdf2885b3d3f0ce2cfaa93d1b7bf289bdc8; 5 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.]
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.