Loading…
4 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2023-06 (a further document filed under the same order number).
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=2023-06&filed=03%2F10%2F2023&h=5f409792e8d379e0), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • WHEREAS, Administrative Order No. 2023 is amended to reflect the nomenclature used by the Clerk when entering a default; and WHEREAS, there are instances when the Clerk of Court’s office mistakenly enters a default in a case; and WHEREAS, an order must be entered by the Court to remove the default. • NOW THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as the Chief Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit and pursuant to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, it is: ORDERED: (1) The Clerk of Court shall notify the Chief Judge in writing within 24 hours of discovering a default has been entered in error. • (2) The Chief Judge shall enter an order vacating the default. • (3) This Amended Administrative Order No. 2023-06 vacates and sets aside Administrative Order No. 2023-06. • (4) This Amended Administrative Order No. 2023-06 shall be recorded by the Clerk of the Court in Duval County in the State of Florida, and shall take effect immediately, and shall remain in full force and effect until further order of the Court.
2. In Duval County, the Clerk of the Court's office will notify the division's presiding Judge upon learning clerk's default has been entered in error. If the presiding Judge is unavailable, the Chief Judge shall review and, if deemed proper, may issue an order vacating the default.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 018c48d408b7a650ffe5826953d7d591fdd2f8df8bab1f777b33ebf2fb134e05. Extracted from the order's own text layer. One of several documents the Clerk publishes under order number 2023-06. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 ebfad55828b759e3d5b5ce026e6970bc99c9f9944206f87943639144e33c2416. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 5f409792e8d379e0cddabf10dafe73264c0cd5fb430777da1f3a81aff40cae5b; 3 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.] Text recomposed 2026-09-08 (Phase 3d): read against the official print (Duval Clerk viewer PDF) through the vision lane; wording unchanged.
27 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2004-23.
1 verbatim requirement from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 2003-06.