Loading…
4 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2023-18.
Fourth Judicial Circuit (Duval). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from the order as served by the Duval Clerk's own application (https://www.duvalclerk.gov/adminOrders/?ao=2023-18&filed=08%2F11%2F2023&h=9081dafc93a000b1), captured 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the document, whitespace normalised only. • NOW THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as the Chief Judge of the Fourth Judicial Circuit and pursuant to the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, it is ORDERED: (1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign all petitions to expunge the criminal history record of human trafficking victims to the Administrative Judge in the Felony Division who will preside over the petition if there is at least one felony offense included in the petition. • (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign all petitions to expunge the criminal history record of human trafficking victims to the Administrative Judge for the County Court who will preside over the petition if there are no felony offenses included in the petition. • (3) Once the Court orders the expungement of the petitioner’s criminal history record, the convictions and charges are deemed vacated. (4) This Administrative Order No. 2023-18 is effective immediately and shall remain in full force and effect until further order of the Court and shall be recorded by the Clerk of the Court in the Official Records of Duval County, in the State of Florida.
(1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to assign all petitions to expunge the criminal history record of human trafficking victims to the Administrative Judge in the Felony Division who will preside over the petition if there is at least one felony offense included in the petition.
Reviewer note: Order PDF sha256: 9081dafc93a000b1b858227f41bc584f8ec1de11debb64c2625f8adf602ca44c. Extracted from the order's own text layer. Identity confirmed by the document's /Title. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extraction 2026-07-26: the operative section was located, but every paragraph in it is OCR of a scanned typescript too corrupt to quote verbatim. No requirement is published from it. The order remains held and sha256-hashed as a source document. | OCR recovery 2026-07-26: the order's embedded text layer was an old, corrupt OCR pass, so the page images were re-rendered at 300 dpi and read again with the Windows OCR engine. Confidence is MEDIUM and the text is labelled as non-verbatim, because fresh OCR of a typewritten carbon copy still misreads characters. Document sha256 9081dafc93a000b1b858227f41bc584f8ec1de11debb64c2625f8adf602ca44c. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, browser-verified): the order renders only inside the Clerk's application; captured via the court's own app, PDF sha256 9081dafc93a000b1b858227f41bc584f8ec1de11debb64c2625f8adf602ca44c; 3 bullet(s) quoted whole from the document.] Text recomposed 2026-09-09 (Phase 3d, Duval batch 15): read against the official print (Duval Clerk viewer PDF) through the vision lane; wording unchanged. Text recomposed 2026-09-09 (Phase 3d, Duval batch 15b): read against the official print (Duval Clerk viewer PDF) through the vision lane; wording unchanged.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.
1 verbatim requirement from Fourth Circuit administrative order 2003-06.