Loading…
5 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., Charles L.W. Helm — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.
Fifth Judicial Circuit (Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion, Sumter). Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Verbatim from https://www.circuit5.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/calendar-conflicts.pdf, harvested 2026-07-25; whitespace normalised only. • In resolving calendar conflicts between the state courts of Florida or between a state court and a federal court in Florida, the following guidelines must be considered: • (1) Any case priority status established by statute, rule of procedure, case law, or otherwise shall be evaluated to determine the effect that resolving a calendar conflict might have on the priority case or cases. • When an attorney is scheduled to appear in 2 courts at the same time and cannot arrange for other counsel to represent the clients’ interests, the attorney shall give prompt written notice of the conflict to opposing counsel, the clerk of each court, and the presiding judge of each case , if known. • If the presiding judge of the case cannot be identified, written notice of the conflict shall be given to the chief judge of the court having jurisdiction over the case, or to the chief judge’s designee. • The judges or their designees shall confer and undertake to avoid the conflict by agreement among themselves.
In resolving calendar conflicts between the state courts of Florida or between a state court and a federal court in Florida, the following guidelines must be considered:
Reviewer note: PDF sha256: b1982b1b85f8dcbeb8c8a9ced396fc86d18f52d525e723a8b96e0de8c280d724. Extracted from the document's own text layer.
3 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1985-48.
2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.