5th Cir. — Marion County – Veteran’s Treatment Court · BenchPath

5th Cir. — Marion County – Veteran’s Treatment Court

High confidence· verified July 26, 2026Administrative Orders5th Jud. Cir., Marion County – Veteran’s Treatment Court — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25

Summary

2 verbatim requirements from 5th Jud. Cir., Marion County – Veteran’s Treatment Court — sha256-hashed 2026-07-25.

Applies to

Fifth Judicial Circuit (Citrus, Hernando, Lake, Marion, Sumter). Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the operative section of this order, re-extracted 2026-07-26; whitespace normalised only. • I agree that the disclosure of the above information, prior to Veteran Treatment Court termination, sentencing, and / or revocation of this consent shall not be a breach of my right to confidentiality. • This information will allow the Team to plan and coordinate the services I need, to impose appropriate sanctions or incentives for my behavior, to submit billings for my services, to maintain data about me, and to audit, evaluate, or conduct research about Veteran Treatment Court activities and effectiveness. • I understand that this consent will remain in effect until there has been a formal and effective termination of my involvement with the Veteran Treatment Court for the above referenced case, EITHER by my successful completion of the Veteran Treatment Court requirements OR upon sentencing for my original offense, if I am terminated from Veteran Treatment Court, OR upon written revocation. • I agree that the disclosure of the above information, prior to Veteran Treatment Court termination, sentencing, and/or revocation of this consent shall not be a breach of my right to confidentiality.

Source of truth

I agree that the disclosure of the above information, prior to Veteran Treatment Court termination, sentencing, and / or revocation of this consent shall not be a breach of my right to confidentiality.

Official source: 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures)
Source health: Healthy · checked September 8, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 26, 2026benchpath-reextract-2026-07-26

Reviewer note: PDF sha256: 8e0085112a394d124d27ca26af418fc1e7bd68dd407ca5b36802b00900c3e063. Extracted from the document's own text layer. | Set to in_review 2026-07-26: the order's subject looks practitioner-facing but the extracted text captured only recitals or an effective date, not the operative ORDERED section. This is an extraction defect, not a judgement that the order is unimportant — it needs re-extraction before it goes back on the published surface. | Re-extracted 2026-07-26 from the numbered paragraphs following the order's ORDERED clause, replacing a first pass that had captured recitals and the effective date. 14 further paragraph(s) were left out because their OCR is too corrupt to quote.

Change history

August 6, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 5, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 2, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 1, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 31, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 30, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 29, 2026Monitor: content changed at 5th Circuit — circuit5.org official site (AOs, judge pages, procedures). Review before republishing dependent rules.

4th Cir. Admin. Order 1985-48 — Final Order Withholding Adjudication of Contempt Donna Price, Juror and Anne Barnhart, Employer

3 verbatim requirements from Fourth Circuit administrative order 1985-48.

High confidence· verified July 25, 20264th Jud. Cir. Admin. Order 1985-48 (Duval Clerk repository)

Administrative OrdersFourth Judicial Circuit

4th Cir. — AO 1986-33A Amended Administrative Order No. 86-33 Compensation for Court Appointed Attorneys in Crimi

2 verbatim requirements from 4th Circuit Administrative Order 1986-33A.

High confidence