Judge Bridget Baker: Continuances — Alachua County, FL · BenchPath

Eighth Cir. — Judge Bridget Baker: Continuances

High confidence· verified September 9, 2026Deadlines & Time ComputationEighth Judicial Circuit, Baker, Bradford and Union – Foreclosures – The Eighth Judicial Circuit of Florida; General Magistrate Bridget Baker’s Division Procedures – The Eighth Judicial Circuit of Florida (pp. PAGE INTRODUCTION, Scheduling Hearings:, Continuance Procedure:) — captured and sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

3 verbatim requirements on continuances.

Applies to

Eighth Judicial Circuit — Judge Bridget Baker only. Practices change without notice; the court's own published text controls. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Source of truth

Baker, Bradford and Union – Foreclosures - PROPOSED ORDERS for the Civil Division will no longer be accepted via e-filing by the Baker, Bradford and Union County Clerks of Court. Motions should continue to be e-filed with the Clerk’s Office. - Final Judgment (FJ) proposed orders should be brought to the hearing with copies for conforming and envelopes (with sufficient postage) for service. (See Administrative Order 1.07). - When all parties can be e-served (except for FJs), the proposed order should be submitted to the Court (in Microsoft Word format) to foreclosures@circuit8.org. A courtesy copy of the motion, and a cover letter (if any), should accompany the proposed order. If there are parties who have not consented to use of e-mail service, the proposed order, copies for conforming and stamped addressed envelopes should be mailed or hand delivered to the foreclosure case manager who

Official source: 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders
Source health: Healthy · checked October 24, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: September 9, 2026benchpath-reverify-2026-09-08 (live text containment) | prior: benchpath-cw-2026-08-04

Provenance record

Source sha256: 62ab5a550a868a711bc39e2d3cc609435b47b27047a9d0f6c3059a0864d23bf6, fc57085175342e9fc6da90dc48640544b4c488437972a64fd68fb4b2d06ed141. Corpus categories: COURTESY_COPIES | PROPOSED_ORDERS | SPECIAL_SET_OR_EXTENDED_HEARING | SCHEDULING_OR_CANCELLATION | FILING_OR_SERVICE, SCHEDULING_OR_CANCELLATION, CONTINUANCES. Operative status as recorded: LIVE_PAGE_CURRENT_AS_CRAWLED. Published during the 2026-07-24 completeness pass. SOURCE DRIFT MEASURED 2026-07-24: the page(s) these requirements were captured from have been edited since capture. A live re-read found 14 of 16 published requirements (88%) still present on 2 source pages (/departments-services/division-procedures-and-proposed-orders/baker-bradford-and-union-foreclosures/, /general-magistrates-hearing-officers/gm-bridget-baker-division-procedures/). The missing text may have been reworded, moved, or withdrawn — BenchPath does not guess which. Confidence LOWERED to medium until a human re-reads the source. Re-verify before relying on any single clause. [RECOMPOSED VERBATIM 2026-08-04 (campaign wave, topical (July quotes no longer live)): 3 bullet(s) quoted whole from the live page, sha256 316d0232fa83fce624bd2131c5dca338ca400ccbbbd25948711c1b92a6086ede; the prior summary-class text is superseded.] Verbatim from the division's live instruction page (https://circuit8.org/departments-services/division-procedures-and-proposed-orders/baker-bradford-and-union-foreclosures/), harvested 2026-08-04; each bullet is quoted whole from the page, whitespace normalised only. [moved from the text 2026-09-14]

Foreclosure

Change history

August 5, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 4, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 2, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 1, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 31, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 30, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 29, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 27, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.