Eighth Cir. — David P. Kreider | Katherine L. Floyd | William E. Davis: Case management · BenchPath

Eighth Cir. — David P. Kreider | Katherine L. Floyd | William E. Davis: Case management

High confidence· verified July 24, 2026Case ManagementEighth Judicial Circuit, Circuit-Wide Civil Division MG (Foreclosures) – The Eighth Judicial Circuit of Florida (pp. Submission Deadlines:, Deadline for Submissions:, Case Management Conferences:) — captured and sha256-hashed 2026-07-24

Summary

4 verbatim requirements on case management.

Applies to

Eighth Judicial Circuit — David P. Kreider | Katherine L. Floyd | William E. Davis only. Practices change without notice; the court's own published text controls. Procedural information only; not legal advice.

Requirement

Verbatim from the published source, captured 2026-07-24; whitespace normalised only. No OCR was used. • The court must receive all materials for the hearing no later than five business days before the hearing. • Please do not submit your proposed order until all applicable time and notice periods have run. If your motion is set for hearing, then submit your proposed order no more than one week prior to the hearing date. All orders shall include a certificate of service at the bottom of the order indicating the name of the party who is to receive the order, as well as that party’s e-service address OR mailing address, if a hard copy is required. • Courtesy copies must be delivered to the court no later than two days before any evidentiary proceeding. • - Any party may request a case management conference (CMC) when a case requires. The court strongly encourages the early use of CMC in more complex cases, multiple-party litigation, or any case that might benefit from court intervention. Unless excused by the court in advance, all CMCs are mandatory for attorneys and self-represented litigants. Parties represented by counsel are not required to appear at a CMC.

Source of truth

The court must receive all materials for the hearing no later than five business days before the hearing.

Official source: 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders
Source health: Healthy · checked September 7, 2026
Effective date: —
Last verified: July 24, 2026benchpath-completeness-2026-07-24

Provenance record

Source sha256: 556f23b1b0b73f1828c24986d47d80851bc485075ea1ba6d7469929127658523. Corpus categories: CASE_MANAGEMENT_OR_TRACK, PROPOSED_ORDERS | CASE_MANAGEMENT_OR_TRACK | FILING_OR_SERVICE, COURTESY_COPIES | CASE_MANAGEMENT_OR_TRACK. Operative status as recorded: LIVE_PAGE_CURRENT_AS_CRAWLED. Published during the 2026-07-24 completeness pass. SOURCE DRIFT MEASURED 2026-07-24: the page(s) these requirements were captured from have been edited since capture. A live re-read found 38 of 41 published requirements (93%) still present on 2 source pages (/general-magistrates-hearing-officers/circuit-wide-civil-division-mg-foreclosures-sales/, /general-magistrates-hearing-officers/circuit-wide-civil-division-mg-foreclosures/). The missing text may have been reworded, moved, or withdrawn — BenchPath does not guess which. Confidence held at high because the overwhelming majority survived verbatim. Re-verify before relying on any single clause. SOURCE DRIFT MEASURED 2026-07-24: the page(s) these requirements were captured from have been edited since capture. A live re-read found 34 of 35 published requirements (97%) still present on 1 source page (/general-magistrates-hearing-officers/probate-judicial-practices-and-procedures/). The missing text may have been reworded, moved, or withdrawn — BenchPath does not guess which. Confidence held at high because the overwhelming majority survived verbatim. Re-verify before relying on any single clause.

Change history

August 5, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 4, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 3, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 2, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
August 1, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 31, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 30, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 29, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.
July 27, 2026Monitor: content changed at 8th Circuit — Administrative Orders. Review before republishing dependent rules.

Pretrial Motions Not Heard by the Transferring Judge Are WAIVED — Trial Division 3

Judge Wolfe enforces AO S-2024-062(28)(A) with teeth: every pretrial motion in a case transferred to TD-3 must be scheduled and heard by the original transferring judge — failure to do so timely is deemed a waiver.

High confidence· verified August 3, 202613th Jud. Cir., Judge Wolfe Practices & Procedures (Trial Division 3), citing AO S-2024-062(28)(A)

Case ManagementHillsborough County · Circuit Criminal Division I · Judge Elizabeth G. Rice

Motions (Except Limine) Waived If Not Heard Before the PTC — Criminal I

Judge Rice mirrors the F-division waiver with an exception: all motions other than motions in limine must be filed AND heard before the Pretrial Conference or they are waived; limine motions must at least be filed by then.

High confidence