The Cooke County District Clerk's e-filing tips for the 235th District Court and the transition to re:SearchTX for electronic delivery of orders and notices in civil and family cases.
Applies to e-filing and electronic service in civil and family cases in the 235th District Court of Cooke County.
The Cooke County District Clerk's e-filing tips direct that a proposed order be submitted as a separate lead document; that exhibits be filed as one document; that a motion and order filed in one envelope go to the judge's queue first; and that family cases (excluding adoption) include the names, not just the initials, of all parties in the style or caption. Per Supreme Court Misc. Docket 24-9030, individual electronic delivery of orders and notices in civil and family cases is through re:SearchTX; parties and attorneys of record must register and set notification preferences, and a party who fails to register and check the account will miss important dates and deadlines and will not receive personal e-mails. The court coordinator sets expunction hearings and requires a separate notice or order setting the hearing.
The Cooke County District Clerk's e-filing tips direct that a proposed order be submitted as a separate lead document; that exhibits be filed as one document; that a motion and order filed in one envelope go to the judge's queue first; and that family cases (excluding adoption) include the names, not just the initials, of all parties in the style or caption. Per Supreme Court Misc. Docket 24-9030,
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-06 from the county-site page (read in full). County-level district-court e-filing rule (division_family); no judge join (clerk page). The 'Delivery of Electronic Copies of Orders and Notices' document (per Misc. Docket 24-9030) is a companion.
Judge Costello's AI section simply restates amended Rule 2.515(d)(2) — the post-AOSC26-12 statewide standard — a compliance model, not a local mandate: signers certify cited authorities exist and are accurately cited, with the rule's own sanctions.
The strongest in-the-wild confirmation of the 2026 statewide AI rule: Judge Bantner's page expressly states his prior AI requirements are REMOVED because of the May 28, 2026 amendment of Rule 2.515 — signing a filing now itself certifies the authorities exist and are accurately cited.