Loading…
The certification that the six-county Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence requires every attorney or self-represented litigant to sign and submit before using AI-generated information in a submission or proceeding: that the signer has reviewed and will comply with the order, that all AI-created or AI-contributed content was independently verified through traditional non-AI legal sources by a human being, and that the signer remains personally responsible and subject to sanctions or contempt for non-compliance.
The form that must accompany any AI-assisted submission in the 24th, 135th and 267th District Courts in DeWitt County under the Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence; posted by the DeWitt District Clerk as a stand-alone fillable form. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
CAUSE NO. ____. Plaintiff/Petitioner v. Defendant/Respondent, In the District Court of ____ Judicial District, ____ County, Texas. CERTIFICATION REGARDING USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. I, the undersigned self-represented litigant/attorney of record in the above-entitled and numbered cause pending in a District Court of one of the following counties: Calhoun, DeWitt, Goliad, Jackson, Refugio or Victoria Counties hereby certify as follows: 1. I have reviewed and understand the Standing Order Regarding use of Artificial Intelligence issued by the District Courts of Calhoun, DeWitt, Goliad, Jackson, Refugio and Victoria Counties and I will comply with that Order throughout this case. 2. Any information created or contributed to by generative artificial intelligence — including, but not limited to, language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analysis — was, before submission to this court, independently verified as accurate using traditional (non-AI) legal sources by a human being. 3. I understand that I remain personally responsible for all filings and submissions to this Court, and that I may be subject to sanctions under the Texas Disciplinary rules of Professional Conduct, the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Chapter 10, the inherent power of the Court, or for contempt of court, for failing to comply with the Court's Standing Order on this certification. SIGNED this ____ day of ____, 202__. Printed Name: ____ [ ] Self-Represented Litigant [ ] Attorney Name; State Bar No.; Attorney for; Address; Telephone; Email.
CAUSE NO. ____. Plaintiff/Petitioner v. Defendant/Respondent, In the District Court of ____ Judicial District, ____ County, Texas. CERTIFICATION REGARDING USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. I, the undersigned self-represented litigant/attorney of record in the above-entitled and numbered cause pending in a District Court of one of the following counties: Calhoun, DeWitt, Goliad, Jackson, Refugio or V
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-07 from BenchPath's own-site custody copy (one page, text layer read in full). Published as its own rule, as the operative compliance instrument of the AI order (the Williamson Rule I.J and Victoria TOPICs 2987 precedents). Bundle member of the DeWitt AI standing order.
A standing order of the 97th Judicial District Court sealing the files in cases in which Child Protective Services or the Department of Family and Protective Services appears as petitioner, in the counties comprising the 97th Judicial District.
Dallas County Standing Order Regarding Children, Pets, Property and Conduct of the Parties (Family District Courts General Orders, current edition F2026/05, revised Jan. 31, 2026 — a re-adoption of the same operative text by the current bench: Hon. Kim Brown (254th), Vonda Bailey (255th), Sandre Streete (256th), Ashley Wysocki (301st), Sandra Jackson (302nd), LaDeitra Adkins (303rd), and Andrea D. Plumlee (330th)), as registered in the statewide TOPICs local-rules registry (posted 01/11/2023). The order "applies in every divorce suit and every suit affecting the parent-child relationship filed in Dallas County" automatically, without request: child-disruption prohibitions, pet protection, party-conduct restraints, divorce-case property/records/insurance freezes with specific authorizations, mandatory petition attachment, and its TRO-to-temporary-injunction lifecycle.