The 90th Judicial District Court's standing order on the use of artificial intelligence, applying to every case in the court for Young and Stephens Counties: a signed AI-use certification with human verification of all AI-generated content, and a prohibition on AI use and recording in the courtroom and court offices.
Applies to every case before the 90th Judicial District Court in Young and Stephens Counties — attorneys and self-represented litigants who use AI must file the certification, and AI use and recording are barred in the courtroom and court offices. Procedural information only; not legal advice.
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence, 90th Judicial District Court for Young and Stephens Counties (filed Feb. 12, 2026). The order applies to every pending or hereafter-filed case in the 90th Judicial District Court, and notes that generative AI systems are currently unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information. IT IS ORDERED that all self-represented litigants and attorneys who use any form of AI for legal research or drafting in connection with a case shall, before using any AI-generated information in a court submission or proceeding, incorporate and certify a form within each pleading generated using AI, certifying that: (1) all language, quotations, sources, citations, arguments, and legal analysis created or contributed to by generative AI were, before submission, verified as accurate through traditional (non-AI) legal sources; and (2) the person understands and acknowledges they are and will be held responsible, and potentially sanctioned, for their or their co-counsel's failure to comply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all individuals entering the courtroom, court offices, or congregating in the hallway near the entrances are prohibited from recording any activities, conversations or events; the use of AI is prohibited in the courtroom or court offices; and using AI to record, listen to, or transcribe any courtroom activity is strictly prohibited. The order is effective immediately and remains in effect until rescinded, replaced or amended.
Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence, 90th Judicial District Court for Young and Stephens Counties (filed Feb. 12, 2026). The order applies to every pending or hereafter-filed case in the 90th Judicial District Court, and notes that generative AI systems are currently unreliable, prone to bias, and often fabricate information. IT IS ORDERED that all self-represented litigants an
Reviewer note: Composed 2026-09-06 from the TOPICs custody scan (read in full via the vision lane). The order is the 90th Judicial District Court's and applies to BOTH Young and Stephens Counties; it was registered by Stephens (2821) and is composed on the Stephens 90th District Court row (Young shares the 90th District Court). A Grayson-class AI regime: signed certification with human verification plus a courtroom AI/recording ban.
A standing order of the 97th Judicial District Court sealing the files in cases in which Child Protective Services or the Department of Family and Protective Services appears as petitioner, in the counties comprising the 97th Judicial District.
Dallas County Standing Order Regarding Children, Pets, Property and Conduct of the Parties (Family District Courts General Orders, current edition F2026/05, revised Jan. 31, 2026 — a re-adoption of the same operative text by the current bench: Hon. Kim Brown (254th), Vonda Bailey (255th), Sandre Streete (256th), Ashley Wysocki (301st), Sandra Jackson (302nd), LaDeitra Adkins (303rd), and Andrea D. Plumlee (330th)), as registered in the statewide TOPICs local-rules registry (posted 01/11/2023). The order "applies in every divorce suit and every suit affecting the parent-child relationship filed in Dallas County" automatically, without request: child-disruption prohibitions, pet protection, party-conduct restraints, divorce-case property/records/insurance freezes with specific authorizations, mandatory petition attachment, and its TRO-to-temporary-injunction lifecycle.