Cal. Code Jud. Ethics, Preface
Cal. Code Jud. Ethics, Preface
Text — As amended by the Supreme Court of California effective July 1, 2020 (the edition the Judicial Council posts, read October 22, 2026)
Formal standards of judicial conduct have existed for more than 65 years. The original Canons of Judicial Ethics promulgated by the American Bar Association were modified and adopted in 1949 for application in California by the Conference of California Judges (now the California Judges Association).
In 1969, the American Bar Association determined that then current needs and problems warranted revision of the canons. In the revision process, a special American Bar Association committee, headed by former California Chief Justice Roger Traynor, sought and considered the views of the bench and bar and other interested persons. The American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Bar Association August 16, 1972.
Effective January 5, 1975, the California Judges Association adopted a new California Code of Judicial Conduct adapted from the American Bar Association 1972 Model Code. The California code was recast in gender-neutral form in 1986.
In 1990, the American Bar Association Model Code was further revised after a lengthy study. The California Judges Association again reviewed the model code and adopted a revised California Code of Judicial Conduct on October 5, 1992.
Proposition 190 (amending Cal. Const., art. VI, § 18, subd. (m), operative March 1, 1995) created a new constitutional provision that states, “The Supreme Court shall make rules for the conduct of judges, both on and off the bench, and for judicial candidates in the conduct of their campaigns. These rules shall be referred to as the Code of Judicial Ethics.”
The Supreme Court formally adopted the 1992 Code of Judicial Conduct in March 1995, as a transitional measure pending further review.
The Supreme Court formally adopted the Code of Judicial Ethics effective January 15, 1996.
The Supreme Court has formally adopted amendments to the Code of Judicial Ethics on several occasions. The Advisory Committee Commentary is published by the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on the Code of Judicial Ethics.
Source of truth
- Edition
- As amended by the Supreme Court of California effective July 1, 2020 (the edition the Judicial Council posts, read October 22, 2026)
- Official file
- https://courts.ca.gov/system/files/rules-court/ca_code_judicial_ethics.pdf (PDF pages 2)
- Text hash
- sha256 1127754c1f7ce2d384da1e66016d35931c07b3f9489b3708a0ebc96202f94fd9
- Composed by
- cje/build 2026-10-22: the Code's PDF (55 pages, line-numbered) read by two readers, PyMuPDF and pdfminer's layout analysis, agreeing on all 417 paragraphs character for character; 114,918 printed glyphs accounted for (110,958 composed, 3,960 margin line numbers and page numbers dropped)
This canon cites
Provisions in this library that the text above cites, as it prints each citation. A range cited as “ss. 61.13-61.16” links its first and last provisions.
California Constitution
Procedural information only. Not legal advice and not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Confirm the current text with the official publisher before relying on it.