Gov. Code, § 66024 · Chapter 9. Protests, Legal Actions, and Audits
Gov. Code, § 66024
Text — As published in the Legislative Counsel's database, tables dated October 18, 2026 (pubinfo_2025.zip)
(a) In any judicial action or proceeding to validate, attack, review, set aside, void, or annul any ordinance or resolution providing for the imposition of a development fee by any city, county, or district in which there is at issue whether the development fee is a special tax within the meaning of Section 50076, the city, county, or district has the burden of producing evidence to establish that the development fee does not exceed the cost of the service, facility, or regulatory activity for which it is imposed.
(b) No party may initiate any action or proceeding pursuant to subdivision (a) unless both of the following requirements are met:
(1) The development fee was directly imposed on the party as a condition of project approval.
(2) At least 30 days prior to initiating the action or proceeding, the party requests the city, county, or district to provide a copy of the documents that establish that the development fee does not exceed the cost of the service, facility, or regulatory activity for which it is imposed. In accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 7922.530, the city, county, or district may charge a fee for copying the documents requested pursuant to this paragraph.
(c) For purposes of this section, costs shall be determined in accordance with fundamental fairness and consistency of method as to the allocation of costs, expenses, revenues, and other items included in the calculation.
Notes and commentary — not statutory text
History
Amended by Stats. 2021, Ch. 615, Sec. 216. (AB 474) Effective January 1, 2022. Operative January 1, 2023, pursuant to Sec. 463 of Stats. 2021, Ch. 615.
Source of truth
- Edition
- As published in the Legislative Counsel's database, tables dated October 18, 2026 (pubinfo_2025.zip)
- Official file
- https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV§ionNum=66024.
- Text hash
- sha256 0a561cc247a6879879173d07b7cb4c86336dacf47879e11980819853c3ea7357
- Composed by
- compose_ca.py 2026-10-22: the Legislative Counsel's CAML content files read by a tokenizer (caml_readers.reader_a); an independent xml.etree reading (caml_readers.reader_b) agrees on every section
This section cites
Provisions in this library that the text above cites, as it prints each citation. A range cited as “ss. 61.13-61.16” links its first and last provisions.
Procedural information only. Not legal advice and not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Confirm the current text with the official publisher before relying on it.