Cal. Rules of Court, rule 10.742 · Chapter 5. Temporary Judges
Use of attorneys as court-appointed temporary judges
Text — As posted by the Judicial Council of California (read October 22, 2026)
(a) Responsibility of the presiding judge
The presiding judge of the trial court is responsible for determining whether that court needs to use attorneys as temporary judges and, if so, the specific purposes for which attorneys are to be appointed as temporary judges.
(b) Conditions for the use of court-appointed temporary judges
The presiding judge may appoint an attorney as a court-appointed temporary judge only if all the following circumstances apply:
(1) The appointment of an attorney to serve as a temporary judge is necessary to fill a judicial need in that court;
(2) The attorney serving as a temporary judge has been approved by the court where the attorney will serve under rule 2.810 et seq.;
(3) The appointment of the attorney as a temporary judge does not result in any conflict of interest; and
(4) There is no appearance of impropriety resulting from the appointment of the attorney to serve as a temporary judge.
Notes and commentary — not rule text
History
(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2007.)
Rule 10.742 amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as rule 6.742 effective July 1, 2006; previously amended and renumbered as rule 10.742 effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2016.
Advisory Committee Comment
Subdivisions (a)-(b). These subdivisions provide that the presiding judge in each court is responsible for determining whether court-appointed temporary judges need to be used in that court, and these subdivisions furnish the criteria for determining when their use is proper. Under (b)(1), the use and appointment of court-appointed temporary judges must be based on judicial needs. Under (b)(3), an attorney serving as a temporary judge would have a conflict of interest if the disqualifying factors in the Code of Judicial Ethics exist. Under (b)(4), the test for the appearance of impropriety is whether a person aware of the facts might entertain a doubt that the judge would be able to act with integrity, impartiality, and competence. In addition to the disqualifying factors listed in the Code of Judicial Ethics, an appearance of impropriety would be generated if any of the limitations in family law, unlawful detainer, and other cases identified in the Code of Judicial Ethics are present.
Source of truth
- Edition
- As posted by the Judicial Council of California (read October 22, 2026)
- Official file
- https://courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index/ten/rule10_742
- Text hash
- sha256 9c30b58169b87fe31eeca3ce1fff80ee2f7d108b534fb4421cdcdc32098b6077
- Composed by
- compose_crc.py 2026-10-22: the Judicial Council's rule pages read paragraph by paragraph; verify_crc.py's second reading of the Council's per-title PDFs finds every paragraph
This rule cites
Provisions in this library that the text above cites, as it prints each citation. A range cited as “ss. 61.13-61.16” links its first and last provisions.
California Rules of Court
Cited by 1 provision
Provisions in this library whose text cites Cal. Rules of Court, rule 10.742. Each shows the citation as that text prints it.
California Rules of Court
Procedural information only. Not legal advice and not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Confirm the current text with the official publisher before relying on it.