Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.785 · Article 4. Disposition
General conduct of hearing
Text — As posted by the Judicial Council of California (read October 22, 2026)
(a) Social study (§§ 280, 702, 706.5)
The probation officer must prepare a social study of the child, which must contain all matters relevant to disposition, including any parole status information, and a recommendation for disposition.
(1) In any case in which the probation officer is recommending placement in foster care or in which the child is already in foster care placement or pending placement under an earlier order, the social study must include a case plan as described in (c).
(2) The probation officer must submit the social study and copies of it to the clerk at least 48 hours before the disposition hearing is set to begin, and the clerk must make the copies available to the parties and attorneys. A continuance of up to 48 hours must be granted on the request of a party who has not been furnished a copy of the social study in accordance with this rule.
(b) Evidence considered (§ 706)
The court must receive in evidence and consider the social study and any relevant evidence offered by the petitioner, the child, or the parent or guardian. The court may require production of other relevant evidence on its own motion. In the order of disposition the court must state that the social study has been read and considered by the court.
(c) Case plan
When a child is detained and is at risk of entering foster care placement, the probation officer must prepare a case plan.
(1) The plan must be completed and filed with the court by the date of disposition or within 60 calendar days of initial removal, whichever occurs first.
(2) The court must consider the case plan and must find as follows:
(A) The probation officer solicited and integrated into the case plan the input of the child, the child's family, in a case described by rule 5.480(2)(A)-(C) the child's identified Indian tribe, and other interested parties; or
(B) The probation officer did not solicit and integrate into the case plan the input of the child, the child's family, in a case described by rule 5.480(2)(A)-(C) the child's identified Indian tribe, and other interested parties. If the court finds that the probation officer did not solicit and integrate into the case plan the input of the child, the child's family, the child's identified Indian tribe, and other interested parties, the court must order that the probation officer solicit and integrate into the case plan the input of the child, the child's family, in a case described by rule 5.480(2)(A)-(C) the child's identified Indian tribe, and other interested parties, unless the court finds that each of these participants was unable, unavailable, or unwilling to participate.
(3) For a child 12 years of age or older and in a permanent placement, the court must consider the case plan and must find as follows:
(A) The child was given the opportunity to review the case plan, sign it, and receive a copy; or
(B) The child was not given the opportunity to review the case plan, sign it, and receive a copy. If the court makes such a finding, the court must order the probation officer to give the child the opportunity to review the case plan, sign it, and receive a copy, unless the court finds that the child was unable, unavailable, or unwilling to participate.
(4) If the probation officer believes that the child will be able to return home through reasonable efforts by the child, the parents or guardian, and the probation officer, the case plan must include the elements described in section 636.1(b).
(5) If the probation officer believes that foster care placement is the most appropriate disposition for the child, the case plan must include all of the information required by section 706.6.
Notes and commentary — not rule text
History
(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 2002.)
(Subd (b) amended effective July 1, 2002.)
(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2021; adopted effective July 1, 2002; previously amended effective January 1, 2007, and July 1, 2013.)
Rule 5.785 amended effective January 1, 2021; adopted as rule 1492 effective January 1, 1991; previously amended effective July 1, 2002, and July 1, 2013; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2007.
Source of truth
- Edition
- As posted by the Judicial Council of California (read October 22, 2026)
- Official file
- https://courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index/five/rule5_785
- Text hash
- sha256 1bf4080f36f0bb6937588fb321e5454f57349d0a7ed18f10f1a861964ebef3fb
- Composed by
- compose_crc.py 2026-10-22: the Judicial Council's rule pages read paragraph by paragraph; verify_crc.py's second reading of the Council's per-title PDFs finds every paragraph
This rule cites
Provisions in this library that the text above cites, as it prints each citation. A range cited as “ss. 61.13-61.16” links its first and last provisions.
California Rules of Court
Cited by 3 provisions
Provisions in this library whose text cites Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.785. Each shows the citation as that text prints it.
California Rules of Court
- Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.778Commencement of hearing on section 601 or section 602 petition; right to counsel; advisement of trial rights; admission, no contestPrinted as rules 5.782 and 5.785
- Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.780Contested hearing on section 601 or section 602 petitionPrinted as rules 5.782 and 5.785
- Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.800Deferred entry of judgmentPrinted as rules 5.785 through 5.795
Procedural information only. Not legal advice and not a substitute for the advice of an attorney. Confirm the current text with the official publisher before relying on it.